Staying the implementation of contentious farm laws andforming a committee to resolve the deadlock between farmers' unions andgovernment, the Supreme Court asserted it was 'extremely disappointed' as tohow the whole issue was being handled by the government.
After the committee was formed, the farmers were notsatisfied with the members of the committee. Later on Bhupinder Singh Mannopted out of the committee leaving behind cracks.
Chief Justice of India, SA Bobde responded to the criticismof the committee, he called it a "peculiar lack of comprehension" onthe constitution of such panels.
"There is a misunderstanding we are noticing. If youappoint a committee and if they had taken a view it does not mean they shouldnot be in the committee," Chief Justice of India added.
"It is okay you have taken a view and you areentitled to change your view. How is this a disqualification? Just because aperson has expressed a view on the matter, that is not a disqualification to bea member of committee. Generally, there is a peculiar lack of comprehensionabout constitution of a committee. They are not judges," CJI said on whyviews expressed in the past disqualified any member.