TSN ads TSN ads

SC declines relief to Punjab DGP. Case to be heard in high court on Feb 26 as scheduled

Mustafa said that "The Attorney General of India K. K. Venugopal gave his assurance and recorded his statement in Supreme Court that all the proceedings will be completed till February 26. Therefore the fear of delay was quashed and we withdrew the petition by ourselves."

Rejecting his Special Leave Petition (SLP) against the Punjab and Haryana High Court’s judgement staying the CAT order against Dinkar Gupta’s appointment, the Supreme Court on Friday declined relief to Punjab DGP hopeful, Mohammad Mustafa.

This is a major setback for Mustafa, as the High Court, in its order of January 21, 2020, had stayed the judgment of the CAT (Central Administrative Tribunal) quashing the appointment of Dinkar Gupta as DGP, Police, Punjab. The present Capt. Amarinder Singh led government had appointed Dinkar Gupta as its DGP from the panel of names sent by the UPSC  to the State.

With the apex court declining to interfere in the  SLP against the interim stay granted by the High Court, Mustafa’s counsel, PS Patwalia, chose to withdraw the petition, paving the way for the High Court to hear the matter on 26th February, 2020, as scheduled.

Also Read: DRDO robot UXOR to be purchased by IAF to defuse bombs 

Earlier, in response to arguments proffered by Patwalia, the Bench of  Justice Sanjeev Khanna and Justice Abul Nazeer pointed out that the order of the High Court was an interim order, and the matter was yet to be heard by the High Court on 26th February 2020.

Refuting the contention made by the counsel appearing for Mustafa that the State of Punjab would try and delay the matter, the Attorney General for India KK Venugopal and Advocate General Punjab Atul Nanda made it clear that the State of Punjab would contest the matter and argue it before the High Court.

In his plea, Mustafa had mainly questioned the "long date" given by the High Court for hearing. 

The appeal against the CAT order. His plea had emphasised on the fact that he is due to retire in February 2021, and as per the SC judgment in Prakash Singh case, the candidate to be selected as DGP should have a minimum residual tenure of 6 months and not be on the verge of retirement.

“If the dispute is allowed to go on and the selection of the petitioner is not considered latest by August 2020, as 6 months’ tenure is necessary for being considered for the post of DGP, then the petitioner will be left out of the entire selection process even after the petitioner has succeeded before the tribunal,” the SLP further stated.

Get the latest update about Supreme Court of India, check out more about Attorney General of India K K Venugopal, , Mohammad Mustafa & Punjab DGP Appointment Row

Like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter for more updates.